Next Patent: Mono-tube type hydraulic shock absorber
Next Patent: Mono-tube type hydraulic shock absorber
Plaque It!
|
[0001] The present invention relates to the field of fall protection systems, and particularly, to energy absorbers for use therein.
[0002] It is known to provide fall protection systems for workers on elevated structures.
[0003] Such fall protection systems commonly consist of a lifeline, which may be a vertical lifeline anchored to an elevated point of the structure or a horizontal lifeline, which extends between horizontally spaced elevated anchorages. Persons working in the vicinity of the lifeline may don a safety harness or belt, and attach same to the lifeline by means of a lanyard, for protection against injury from falls.
[0004] It is well known to include means for absorbing energy in such fall protection systems, so as to ensure that the maximum arrest forces exerted upon persons using such fall protection systems do not exceed physically injurious levels, and also to reduce the force placed on the anchorages therefor to manageable levels.
[0005] In some applications, this may be affected simply by providing elasticity in the lifeline and/or lanyard. However, this methodology requires great care in deployment, particularly when the lifeline is lengthy, as is the case when anchorages are horizontally-spaced far apart from one another, since excessive elasticity in a lifeline may, disastrously, allow a user to come into contact with the ground, or other obstructions, prior to deceleration.
[0006] As well, excessive elasticity can result in undesirable rebound, increasing the chance of injury.
[0007] Accordingly, in modern fall protection systems, it is most common to utilize a substantially inelastic lifeline and to delegate energy absorption functionality to separate energy absorption apparatus which does not exhibit undesirable rebound.
[0008] Energy absorption apparatus interposed between a horizontal lifeline and its anchorage are most commonly termed “energy absorbers”, and energy absorption apparatus interposed between a lanyard and a harness are most commonly termed “shock absorbers” but the terms are used somewhat interchangeably in the art, and indeed, many types of energy absorption apparatus are used interchangeably (to wit, in both applications). Accordingly, such apparatus are hereinafter referred to universally as “energy absorbers” for simplicity.
[0009] One class of energy absorber of the prior art is exemplified by U.S. Pat. No. 5,598,900 (O'Rourke), issued Feb. 4, 1997. In this energy absorber, a pair of rings are provided, which are secured to one another by a strip of tear-ply webbing material and by a strip of woven webbing material.
[0010] In a fall, the tear-ply webbing separates incrementally, with consequent absorption of energy, until such time as the energy absorber elongates to the length of the woven webbing material, whereupon elongation stops, and further loading is borne by the woven webbing material.
[0011] This energy absorber is known to be relatively inexpensive to manufacture, and to provide satisfactory energy absorption, but, by virtue of its nature, is useful only for a single use, which is disadvantageous inter alia from the standpoint of economy.
[0012] Another class of energy absorber is exemplified by U.S. Pat. No. 5,197,573 (De La Fuente et al.), issued Mar. 30, 1993.
[0013] This energy absorber, which is of all metal construction, and which dissipates kinetic energy in a fall by rolling balls which are forced by a tapered surface on an expandable sleeve to frictionally load a force rod, is suitable for repetitive use, and as such, overcomes some of the drawbacks of the class exemplified by the O'Rourke patent, but is of relatively complex and expensive construction.
[0014] It is an object of the present invention to provide an energy absorber for use in a fall protection system which is suitable for repetitive use and which is of relatively simple and inexpensive construction as compared to devices of similar functionality of the prior art.
[0015] This object, among others, is attained by the present invention, an energy absorber for use in a fall protection system.
[0016] As one aspect of the invention, the energy absorber comprises a housing, a plunger assembly and a quantity of resilient compressible material.
[0017] The housing has a tubular body portion and an end wall portion.
[0018] The tubular body portion has a tubular first end portion and a tubular second end portion and defines a longitudinal axis extending therebetween.
[0019] The end wall portion is secured to the first end portion to substantially occlude same and has defined therethrough an aperture disposed about said longitudinal axis.
[0020] The plunger assembly, which includes a plunger head disposed within said body portion and a plunger rod rigidly extending from said plunger head, through the aperture in the end wall portion, to a terminal end, is disposed at a rest position, whereat the plunger head is relatively distal to the end wall portion, and is mounted to said housing for longitudinal movement between the rest position and an extended position, whereat the plunger head is relatively proximal to the end wall portion.
[0021] The quantity of resilient compressible material is disposed within said body portion between the end wall portion and the plunger head for compression by the plunger head upon movement of the plunger assembly from the rest position to the extended position thereof, and is adapted to absorb energy in the course of such compression in a manner such that, if the terminal end of the plunger rod and the second end portion of the body portion are drawn apart by the load of an object of a predetermined mass falling a predetermined distance, the maximum arrest force exerted on the object does not exceed a predetermined level.
[0022] Other advantages, features and characteristics of the present invention, as well as methods of operation and functions of the related elements of the structure, and the combination of parts and economies of manufacture, will become more apparent upon consideration of the following detailed description and the appended claims with reference to the accompanying drawings, the latter of which is briefly described hereinafter.
[0023] In the accompanying drawings, wherein similar reference numerals denote similar parts, and which are for the purpose of illustration and description only, and are not intended as a definition of the limits of the invention:
[0024]
[0025]
[0026]
[0027]
[0028]
[0029]
[0030]
[0031]
[0032]
[0033]
[0034]
[0035]
[0036]
[0037]
[0038]
[0039]
[0040]
[0041]
[0042]
[0043]
[0044] Referring now generally to
[0045] The energy absorber
[0046] The housing
[0047] The tubular body portion
[0048] The end wall portion
[0049] The cap
[0050] The plunger assembly
[0051] The plunger head
[0052] A grommet
[0053] The quantity of resilient compressible material
[0054] The tubular cushion
[0055] Each tubular cushion segment
[0056] The tubular cushion
[0057] The connection means
[0058] In use, the first lug
[0059] The sequence of
[0060] The various components of the energy absorber described above may be tailored (choice of materials, size, etc.) by persons of ordinary skill in the art to meet different energy absorption needs, using mechanical principles well-known to such persons, which are accordingly not set out in detail herein.
[0061] In one experiment, a number of energy absorbers according to the preferred embodiment were constructed as follows:
plunger rod: ½ inch OD plunger head: 3 inch OD body portion: 3 inch ID tubular cushion segments used: 4 tubular cushion segment length: 3 inch cylindrical exterior surfaces: 2 inch OD annular grooves radial depth: {fraction (3/6)} inch annular grooves longitudinal width: ⅓ inch annular grooves longitudinal spacing: ⅓ inch
[0062] Energy absorbers so constructed were affixed to each of two anchorages, horizontally spaced-apart approximately 60 feet from one another, and a conventional lifeline was operatively affixed to each energy absorber. As well, a further energy absorber so constructed was affixed to a 100 kg weight, and in turn, affixed to the lifeline by a conventional 1.8 metre lanyard.
[0063] The weight was allowed to fall freely a distance of 1.8 metres, and forces were measured, whereupon it was observed that anchorage forces were in the range of 8-12 KN and that the maximum arrest force exerted on the weight was in the range 3.5 KN, both of which figures being well within the prescribed standards in North America.
[0064] In another test, a single energy absorber, constructed as above, was affixed between a 100 kg weight and an anchored 1.8 metre lanyard, the weight was permitted to drop 1.8 metres, and forces were measured. Again, measurements showed that the maximum arrest force exerted on the weight was in the range 3.5 KN which is beneath injury levels for average healthy adults, and in any event, is within the applicable North American safety standard of 4 KN. (In both cases, undesirable levels of rebound were not observed.)
[0065] Of course, it is also possible to satisfy differing energy absorption needs by modifying the manner in which the energy absorber is used (as opposed to modifying the structure of the energy absorber itself).
[0066] As one example, a pair of energy absorbers may be utilized in parallel, to meet the energy absorption needs of persons whose mass exceeds 100 kg.
[0067] As another example, a flexible strength component (not shown), of a length greater than the distance between the first lug and the second lug when the plunger assembly is at its extended position, and having a selected static breaking strength which is greater than the maximum tension shock load encountered in the projected use of the fall protection system, may be coupled in use between the first lug and the second lug, to provide for redundancy, in the event of a mechanical failure in the energy absorber.
[0068] It should also be appreciated that various modifications and alterations may be used in the design and manufacture of the energy absorber according to the present invention, for reasons unrelated to energy absorption needs.
[0069] For example, whereas in the preferred embodiment illustrated, the body portion is cylindrical, it will be evident that other shapes could be readily employed with equal utility.
[0070] Similarly, whereas in the preferred embodiment illustrated, the annular grooves are substantially square in radial cross-section, this need not be the case, and indeed, the grooves may be omitted entirely.
[0071] Additionally, whereas in the preferred embodiment, the cap is provided, and is threaded on the exterior of the second end portion of the body portion to occlude same and constrain the plunger assembly against longitudinal movement beyond the rest position thereof, it will be evident that the cap could readily be welded in place, or omitted altogether.
[0072] Further, whereas in the preferred embodiment, the end wall portion and the body portion are welded to one another, other connections could be employed (such as screw threading), or the end wall portion and the body portion could be formed integrally, for example, by casting.
[0073] Likewise, whereas the second lug and the cap of the preferred embodiment are constructed integrally, same could, for example, be stamped separately, and welded to one another.
[0074] As well, whereas the grommet of the preferred embodiment is constructed of EPDM, it will be evident that other materials could be employed, and indeed, the grommet could readily be omitted altogether if suitable water resistant materials were employed for the remaining components. Yet further, whereas the preferred embodiment employs an NBR/PVC polymer having a hardness of 65 Shore A for the tubular cushion, other polymers may be employed with similar utility. Polymers selected from NBR/PVC, NBR and neoprene, of hardness ranging between 40 and 60 durometer Shore A, have proven useful in this application.
[0075] In addition to the foregoing, whereas in the preferred embodiment illustrated, the tubular cushion has physical properties which enable same to absorb sufficient kinetic energy to avoid injury in persons using the same, while at the same time, unexpectedly, avoiding injuriously energetic rebound, it should be understood that it is possible to employ tubular cushions constructed out of compressible material having different physical characteristics, in which case arresting means for arresting movement of the plunger assembly towards the rest position thereof may be employed to avoid potentially injurious rebound.
[0076] An alternative embodiment of the present invention, wherein such arresting means are provided, and designated with reference numeral
[0077] As best indicated in
[0078] Such mounting is provided in the alternate embodiment illustrated via a pair of arm mounts
[0079] The arresting means
[0080] In normal operation, the energy absorber of the alternate embodiment is interposed into a fall protection system in the conventional manner previously discussed, with care being taken to ensure that, in a fall situation, the first lug
[0081] In this condition, gravity biases gripping arms
[0082] In fall conditions, the plunger assembly
[0083] At the extended position of the plunger assembly
[0084] For reuse, the screws
[0085] Although only two embodiments of the present invention are herein described with particularity, from the foregoing it will be evident that other embodiments falling within the scope of the invention are possible.
[0086] For example, whereas in the alternate embodiment illustrate, gravity biases the gripping arms for movement towards their respective gripping positions, it is possible to modify the size and physical characteristics of the grommet to so bias the gripping arms and obviate the need to ensure that the energy absorber is deployed in an upright manner in use.
[0087] Accordingly, it should be understoodthat the scope of the exclusive property and privilege sought is limited only by the accompanying claims, purposively construed.